Prince Harry might have been on a break but questions have to be asked about his thinking? This man is third in line to the throne, some people are saying that he was an unwitting victim, that's not correct, he's a 27 year old man and must have known when he took his clothes off that there would have been people in the room, an alleged ten males and fifteen women. How many of these were friends and how many were gate crashers, or hangers on? Reports say that he was covering the girl up with his body to protect her modesty, what a load of rubbish why were they naked in the first place? Why did his Royal Protection team not step in and confiscate the peoples phones and check them for this kind of thing, and delete any embarrassing photos.These protection officers are costing the country millions of pounds each year to protect these Royals. Perhaps we need to be getting answers to why they failed to stop this? A few months ago eleven of President Obamas Secret Service Agents checking out security in Colombia before his visit were reported drinking and cavorting with prostitutes, these agents were recalled immediatly to America and repremanded senior ones were dismissed for dereliction of duty, perhaps this should happen to Harry's protection officers. As for his cavorting about he hasn't done the Royals image any credibility but let's hope that Prince Charles has a quiet word with him. But more importantly about the photographs being shown in the Sun Newspaper, we want a free press and if the Royals and othere in these high profile positions don't want their dirty linen washing in the public domain make sure they know who their friends are before they want to carry on in such a way.
No comments:
Post a Comment