Which side of the fence do they sit on?.

With the on going debacle over injunctions and superinjunctions why should we take any notice of the judges that have issued them? Mr Justice Eady has issued 11 injunctions, but when he was a QC he defended tabloid newspapers to expose the private lives of public figures. Then we have Mrs Justice Sharp, as a barrister acting in libel cases she would frequently criticise the privacy orders she now dispenses. She has now upheld seven injunctions. It looks like these are the kinds of people who have ridden  with both the hounds as well as the foxes. Who says that the leopard can't change its spots, or does it really depend on which side of the judiciary you now sit on.It looks like the law means nothing to them, when it comes to more power and status